Question follow-through · 28537
British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme: Hamilton and Clyde Valley
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what estimate she has made of the number of former mineworkers and dependants in Hamilton and Clyde Valley constituency impacted by the return of the British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme
About this written question
A written question asks a government minister for information in writing. Parliament publishes the question and any answer.
- Answering body
- Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
- Tabled
- 9 Sept 2026
- Target answer date
- 14 Sept 2026
- Answer
- 14 Sept 2026 · 5 calendar days after tabling
Elapsed calendar days describe the record timeline, not whether Parliament considers an answer on time.
Votes on this topic
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5 · 1 Jul 2026
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4 · 1 Jul 2026
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2 · 1 Jul 2026
These Commons divisions share a topic label. The question did not necessarily lead to a vote.
Recorded timeline
9 Sept 2026
Question tabled
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what estimate she has made of the number of former mineworkers and dependants in Hamilton and Clyde Valley constituency impacted by the return of the British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme
14 Sept 2026
Target answer date
Date supplied by the official written-questions record.
14 Sept 2026
Answer published
As of 30 October 2024, there were 38 British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme members in Hamilton and Clyde Valley constituency.
Official data retrieved 1 Oct 2026.
Later records
Possible follow-up questions
Strong links require the same MP, department and exact heading. Other same-department questions are shown as unreviewed candidates, not as confirmed follow-ups. No debate link is asserted unless a stable source relationship exists.
No later same-department questions indexed.
This is an absence in covered public data, not evidence that no follow-up occurred elsewhere.