Question follow-through · 21604
National Security
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to page 87 of the Strategic Defence Review, published 2 June 2025, what progress has been made by the Cabinet Office on planning for a whole-of-society approach to the UK’s security and resilience
About this written question
A written question asks a government minister for information in writing. Parliament publishes the question and any answer.
- Answering body
- Cabinet Office
- Tabled
- 28 Aug 2026
- Target answer date
- 2 Sept 2026
- Answer
- 8 Sept 2026 · 11 calendar days after tabling
Elapsed calendar days describe the record timeline, not whether Parliament considers an answer on time.
Votes on this topic
- Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amendment · 23 Jun 2026
- Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness · 23 Jun 2026
- Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11 · 22 Jun 2026
These Commons divisions share a topic label. The question did not necessarily lead to a vote.
Recorded timeline
28 Aug 2026
Question tabled
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to page 87 of the Strategic Defence Review, published 2 June 2025, what progress has been made by the Cabinet Office on planning for a whole-of-society approach to the UK’s security and resilience
2 Sept 2026
Target answer date
Date supplied by the official written-questions record.
8 Sept 2026
Answer published
The Strategic Defence Review, Resilience Action Plan, and National Security Strategy make clear the importance of a whole-of-society approach to the UK’s security and resilience. The Resilience Action Plan, published on 8 July 2025, sets out the Governmen...
Official data retrieved 28 Sept 2026.
Later records
Possible follow-up questions
Strong links require the same MP, department and exact heading. Other same-department questions are shown as unreviewed candidates, not as confirmed follow-ups. No debate link is asserted unless a stable source relationship exists.
No later same-department questions indexed.
This is an absence in covered public data, not evidence that no follow-up occurred elsewhere.