Question follow-through · 21212
Fuel Oil and Liquefied Petroleum Gas: VAT
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of reducing VAT on heating oil and liquefied petroleum gas for households not connected to the gas grid, in the context of the Government’s planned reduction in VA
About this written question
A written question asks a government minister for information in writing. Parliament publishes the question and any answer.
- Answering body
- Treasury
- Tabled
- 28 Aug 2026
- Target answer date
- 2 Sept 2026
- Answer
- 7 Sept 2026 · 10 calendar days after tabling
Elapsed calendar days describe the record timeline, not whether Parliament considers an answer on time.
Votes on this topic
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5 · 1 Jul 2026
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4 · 1 Jul 2026
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2 · 1 Jul 2026
These Commons divisions share a topic label. The question did not necessarily lead to a vote.
Recorded timeline
28 Aug 2026
Question tabled
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of reducing VAT on heating oil and liquefied petroleum gas for households not connected to the gas grid, in the context of the Government’s planned reduction in VA
2 Sept 2026
Target answer date
Date supplied by the official written-questions record.
7 Sept 2026
Answer published
The Government has announced a cut in VAT on electricity bills to give millions of households breathing space on the cost of living. Around 29 million households in the UK are expected to benefit from this change.The Government has also announced over £50...
Official data retrieved 28 Sept 2026.
Later records
Possible follow-up questions
Strong links require the same MP, department and exact heading. Other same-department questions are shown as unreviewed candidates, not as confirmed follow-ups. No debate link is asserted unless a stable source relationship exists.
No later same-department questions indexed.
This is an absence in covered public data, not evidence that no follow-up occurred elsewhere.