Question follow-through · 119568
Tax Avoidance
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how she plans to undertake loan charge settlement for those impacted prior to December 2010.
About this written question
A written question asks a government minister for information in writing. Parliament publishes the question and any answer.
- Answering body
- Treasury
- Tabled
- 10 Mar 2026
- Target answer date
- 12 Mar 2026
- Answer
- 18 Mar 2026 · 8 calendar days after tabling
Elapsed calendar days describe the record timeline, not whether Parliament considers an answer on time.
More questions by this MP on Economy and business
- Tax Avoidance · 25 Mar 2026
- Tax Avoidance · 25 Mar 2026
- Tax Avoidance · 25 Mar 2026
- Tax Avoidance · 25 Mar 2026
- Tax Avoidance · 17 Jun 2026
Shared topic keywords suggest a connection; they do not establish a follow-up.
Votes on this topic
- Draft Code of Practice on Electronic and Workplace Ballots for Statutory Trade Union Ballots · 15 Jul 2026
- Draft Trade Unions (Permissible Means of Voting) and Employment Rights (Unfair Dismissal) (Amendment) Order 2026 · 15 Jul 2026
- Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5 · 1 Jul 2026
These Commons divisions share a topic label. The question did not necessarily lead to a vote.
Recorded timeline
10 Mar 2026
Question tabled
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how she plans to undertake loan charge settlement for those impacted prior to December 2010.
12 Mar 2026
Target answer date
Date supplied by the official written-questions record.
18 Mar 2026
Answer published
This Government recognised that concerns continued to be raised about the loan charge and that some felt strongly that this had not been handled appropriately. The Government therefore commissioned an independent review of the loan charge to bring the mat...
Official data retrieved 28 Sept 2026.
Later records
Possible follow-up questions
Strong links require the same MP, department and exact heading. Other same-department questions are shown as unreviewed candidates, not as confirmed follow-ups. No debate link is asserted unless a stable source relationship exists.
Tax Avoidance
25 Mar 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of the number of outstanding cases of people liable to the loan charge that will be settled as a result of the McCann Review.
Tax Avoidance
25 Mar 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to offer the same settlement terms that will be provided in the settlement opportunity resulting from the implementation of the McCann Review to those that have already settled with HMRC.
Tax Avoidance
25 Mar 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the value-for-money to the taxpayer of the Loan Charge.
Tax Avoidance
25 Mar 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the success of the Loan Charge and HMRC’s approach to dealing with so-called disguised remuneration schemes.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment HMRC has made of the circumstances of individuals affected by the Loan Charge who acted on professional advice.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps HMRC has taken to investigate and pursue promoters, agencies and advisers who profited from disguised remuneration schemes.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much HMRC expects to recover from remaining Loan Charge and disguised remuneration cases.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of the cost to the public purse of continuing to pursue remaining Loan Charge and disguised remuneration cases.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many Loan Charge and disguised remuneration cases the Government expects to remain unresolved following implementation of the McCann review proposals.
Tax Avoidance
17 Jun 2026 · To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment the Government has made of the potential impact of Loan Charge and disguised remuneration cases on affected individuals’ financial wellbeing and mental health.