Munira Wilson MP: speeches

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026

How these years work

Our reporting years run from 4 July to 3 July, starting with the 2024 general election. They are not official parliamentary sessions. Office costs keep IPSA’s April–March financial years. Records may cover only part of a year; a missing record does not mean no work was done.

Read what this MP said, asked and contributed in Parliament.

37 published records · newest first.

Speeches

  • 25 Jun 2026 · Topical Questions · Hansard source
    More

    T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

  • 22 Jun 2026 · Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Newborn Screening Test · Hansard source
    More

    I congratulate the hon. Member on his speech. I join him in paying tribute to Jesy Nelson and her campaigning. I also pay tribute to the parents of little Charlie in my constituency. In the words of his mother, he was “very lucky to celebrate his first birthday last August.” He was treated with gene therapy after being diagnosed and following symptoms. He is now living his life, but in a wheelchair. Had he been screened at birth he might have had treatment sooner and he might be walking right now.

  • 22 Jun 2026 · Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Newborn Screening Test · Hansard source
    More

    rose—

  • 9 Jun 2026 · Healthwatch · Hansard source
    More

    20. If he will make it his policy to retain Healthwatch.

  • 22 Apr 2026 · Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill · Hansard source
    More

    Will the Minister give way?

  • 20 Apr 2026 · Topical Questions · Hansard source
    More

    I was deeply alarmed by reports that Labour MPs were being given pre-written feedback to share, following consultation sessions with constituents on the Government’s special needs reforms. The Secretary of State promised to put families at the heart of her changes, so will she assure parents and carers that the SEND consultation is entirely free from political interference and that they will be listened to, especially with regard to their rights?

  • 14 Apr 2026 · Healthy Babies Funding · Hansard source
    More

    May I welcome the Minister to her new post? The Government’s support for Healthy Babies is very welcome, but the best way to keep babies who have type 1 spinal muscular atrophy healthy and help them to lead normal lives is by screening them at birth, because they can then access transformative gene therapy. My constituent little Charlie, who will soon be two, would be walking now instead of learning to use a wheelchair if he had been diagnosed at birth through screening, rather than when he was a few months old. Will the Minister consider adding SMA type 1 screening to the newborn screening schedule?

  • 17 Mar 2026 · Victims’ Rights · Hansard source
    More

    8. What steps he is taking to support victims’ rights.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I am perplexed, because I think there is support on both sides of the House for restricting online harms and protecting our children, and for the principle of bringing forward legislation, although I understand that people are vexed about the procedural point. I fear that there has been some contorting to find a way to justify voting against this motion. I am sorry that that is the case, because we Liberal Democrats are ready to work in a cross-party manner to create the safer future that our children deserve so that they can flourish and thrive in the online and offline worlds. I hope colleagues across the Chamber will support us.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I am about to come to an end.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I have not said that we should focus only on age-gating; as I continue through my speech, the hon. Gentleman will hear about the range of other things that I think should be in any legislation that is brought forward—quickly—to protect our children. The age-gating of certain platforms based on their harmfulness, which would be a key principle and part of the legislation, is part of our proposals, but so are various other things that I will talk about in terms of tackling the addictiveness of algorithms that is so damaging to our children.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    We are debating today the principle of bringing forward legislation quickly. I know that the Government are saying that they want to bring forward legislation sometime in the future. We do not know when that is. I am trying to put a timeframe on it, because we know that what will come back shortly from the other place in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill will not be accepted by this House. That is why I am trying to find an opportunity for us all to come together and get to a point that we all agree on. This is about agreeing the principle that we should have primary legislation sooner rather than later. I am happy to make time in my diary tomorrow to start those discussions.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I will not give way again, because I think we have tested this argument to death. I understand the hon. Lady’s concerns about procedure, but this mechanism is not unheard of. The Labour party did something similar on fracking a few years ago when Liz Truss was Prime Minister. I remember it well—I was in this place, as was the hon. Lady—and we voted on that. There was no substance, but Labour wanted to bring forward legislation.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I was just about to end my remarks, but I will give way.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    While the House would be giving me, or the Liberal Democrats, control of the Order Paper, I have made it abundantly clear that we would work together to bring forward legislation— [ Interruption. ] The Conservatives have proposals; the Government are consulting on something, although I am not quite sure what, because they have not published the consultation yet. We put forward proposals in the other place that the hon. Gentleman’s party unfortunately chose not to support. However, I do not think we are that far apart. We have published proposals in the other place and would use those as a basis for discussion. The Technology Secretary has already told me and my hon. Friend the Member for Harpenden and Berkhamsted (Victoria Collins) that she would happily work with us on our proposals. There are proposals out there in the public domain. This is about the principle of legislating soon and quickly to bring forward legislation that we can all agree on to protect our children.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    Discussing the substance of the issue is exactly what we are seeking to do. It has been a long time since this Chamber has had a proper debate on these issues. In a few weeks’ time, we will discuss amendments that suggest individual parties’ views on the way forward. We are proposing a discussion on what the proposals should be so that we can return with a piece of legislation that meets the needs and requirements of the public—our children and young people, and their parents and carers. We Liberal Democrats say to Ministers and the official Opposition that we have a set of solutions, and we will work with them in the best interests of children. We need to act now, so they should vote with us today and make time for this Bill on the legislative agenda. If the Government do not want to make time for our Bill, perhaps they will make time for one of their own, but we need one quickly. We stand ready to work across parties to create the safer future that our children deserve—

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I will take one final intervention.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    The harms-based framework that we proposed in the other place would apply to chatbots and gaming as well. The point is that, as I have already laid out, we would come together and come forward with proposals that we can all agree on.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I am very grateful that the hon. Member wishes to help me out, but I suspect that he does not have my best interests at heart. [Hon. Members: “Aw!”] Oh, go on; I am happy to take his intervention.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    It is always a pleasure to give way to the hon. Gentleman, who is the first to intervene in the debate, and I entirely agree with him. I will touch on the point about phones in schools later, and I believe that we will have a chance to vote on that specific measure shortly, when the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill returns to this House. As I have said, we want to approach this legislation in a cross-party way, but let me now turn to what the Liberal Democrats would ideally like to see in it.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    All I can do is repeat myself: I know that if I had published all these things that I am laying out as a piece of legislation, Members on both sides of the House would probably have voted it down. I have told the House that I am happy to come forward in the spirit of co-operation to draft something together—

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    No, I will not give way; I would not expect the hon. Member to help me out. At various points, we have tabled all the things I have mentioned as amendments in both Houses, so they have been drafted—although I am happy to admit that they have not been put together in one Bill for me to present today. I apologise on that procedural point, Madam Deputy Speaker, which I can see has upset many Members, but all the proposals that I have outlined have been tabled in both Houses as amendments to various Bills, including the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill and the Data (Use and Access) Bill. To reiterate, the only consultation that we should focus on now ought to relate to how the restrictions might work in practice, not whether they are needed at all—the public and campaign groups have made their views on that pretty clear already, whether they support or oppose a blanket ban. Although I have been criticised for coming forward without a Bill, the whole point was to say, “Let’s work together,” because I think there is cross-party consensus on this matter.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I have given way to the hon. Member a couple of times. I am just about to finish.

  • 24 Feb 2026 · Online Harm: Child Protection · Hansard source
    More

    I thank the hon. Lady for her intervention about procedure. I say to her gently that her party and others have in the past used this mechanism to try to force Governments to introduce legislation on various issues.

  • 12 Feb 2026 · Heathrow Expansion · Hansard source
    More

    14. What recent progress her Department has made on Heathrow expansion.

Explore activity by topic or department

Contributions by debate topic

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained.

View as listCommunities and local government: 27Communities and local government27Culture, media and sport: 32Culture, media and sport32Defence and foreign affairs: 4Defence and foreign affairs4Democracy and constitution: 11Democracy and constitution11Economy and business: 36Economy and business36Education and skills: 49Education and skills49Environment and energy: 8Environment and energy8Health and care: 22Health and care22Housing and planning: 7Housing and planning7Immigration and borders: 2Immigration and borders2Justice and policing: 20Justice and policing20Social security and pensions: 10Social security and pensions10Transport: 15Transport15Unclassified: 37Unclassified37
What this shows and doesn't show
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained. Published records do not measure effort or effectiveness. Methodology.
Department or topicPublished records
Communities and local government27
Culture, media and sport32
Defence and foreign affairs4
Democracy and constitution11
Economy and business36
Education and skills49
Environment and energy8
Health and care22
Housing and planning7
Immigration and borders2
Justice and policing20
Social security and pensions10
Transport15
Unclassified37

Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →