Michael Shanks MP: speeches

Speeches

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  The hon. Lady raises the potential of hydrogen in our energy mix. Of course, one of the real strengths of the gas network is that it can be changed into other things in the future; that is a real strength of what we have, and we are looking at what those options might be. There is a mix of options available with hydrogen, including home heating, but it could still play a really key role in industrial projects, for example, in the shorter term. We are looking at those projects. We need to ensure that it is financially viable and that we have worked out all the technological details on how we would make it happen. We will have more to say on that in due course.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  Characteristically, the hon. Gentleman raises an important point, and he has raised similar points with me before. It is important that the most vulnerable on the priority registers are prioritised for any additional support, and that is what we continue to do. Energy is a transferred matter in Northern Ireland, so I do not have a direct role to play in the gas system there, but I continue to engage with both Ministers in the Northern Ireland Executive that have an interest in this topic, and we have talked about these issues most recently.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  That is a really important point. My hon. Friend the Minister for Energy Consumers is leading a review of some of this work, and will have more to say about it soon. We need a scheme that rolls out far more insulation to retrofit homes. We have also driven forward a higher standard for new houses, but the delivery of the schemes has been questionable in places. I recognise some of her points, and that is part of what we have been reviewing. I recently met my Welsh counterpart to talk about planning regulations that are being brought forward in Wales, which will also make a difference to these kinds of projects.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  Energy security is a key priority for this Government, and at no time was there any concern about Britain’s energy system being able to meet demand. Our systems worked entirely as intended. We had capacity to deal with market constraints, and that has been backed up by the two authoritative voices on this issue in the country—National Gas, which runs the gas network, and the National Energy System Operator. We have sufficient gas supply and electricity capacity to meet demand this winter, due to our diverse and resilient system. While storage is an important flexibility tool in the gas system, our varied sources of gas supply mean that the UK is less reliant on storage than some other European countries that have a more limited supply options. Our diverse options include the UK continental shelf, our long-term energy partner Norway, international markets via the second largest liquefied natural gas onshoring capacity in Europe, and two interconnectors. Gas storage is used throughout the year, but typically operates in winter to help meet peaks in demand. Through colder spells, storage levels are expected to fluctuate across the winter period. That is what happened last week following the severe cold weather, and it is a sign that the gas and storage markets are working exactly as they should. That is precisely why we have those systems in place. In their winter outlooks, National Gas and the National Energy System Operator assessed that there is sufficient supply to meet winter demand, including the role of storage. On Friday, National Gas, the owner and operator of Britain’s gas networks, confirmed that “the overall picture across Great Britain’s eight gas storage sites remains healthy.” We will continue to work closely with National Gas, NESO and storage operators to maintain continued security of supply. I reiterate: Britain’s energy system is working to continue to meet the demand of consumers across the country.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  The decision on whether to run gas storage sites is a commercial one for Centrica. The storage site at Rough was closed between 2017 and 2022—hon. Members may remember that that was when the “beast from the east” was attacking the country. The previous Government will have to answer for the decisions that they made on that. We are making it clear that the only way to build the energy system that we need in the long term is the clean power action plan. The Conservatives used to support much of that but, increasingly, they have decided to walk away from it. They will either keep us attached to the volatile fossil fuel markets, with all the price spikes that our constituents continue to pay the price of, or they will have to come up with an alternative plan. We are getting on with doing the work.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  The hon. Lady is right; this is an incredibly important issue that gets to the heart of the fact we inherited from the previous Government not just an economic mess but a series of policy decisions not made, and an energy system that needed us to take serious decisions quickly to build resilience for the future. On the broader point about consumers, she will know that my hon. Friend the Minister for consumers is doing a lot of work on exactly what the warmer homes scheme will look like, to ensure that people have as warm a home as possible. She is right that at times such as this, the people in the poorest households struggle the most. We are doing what we can to ensure that homes are insulated and, in the long term, to bring down bills. The only way to do that is to deliver clean power by 2030—faster than the previous Government would ever have managed.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  That is the kind of extremist scaremongering that we have come to expect from the shadow Secretary of State on Twitter, but we are now hearing it in the House. It is thoroughly irresponsible to use such language. In my answer, I read the very clear view of the National Energy System Operator, which runs the system and is the expert. I repeat it for the benefit of the House: “At no point were electricity supplies less than anticipated demand and our engineers were able to rebalance the system without the need to consider emergency measures.” The shadow Minister and Back-Bench MPs can repeat the phrasing around blackouts all they like, but at no point was that a concern. The reality is that while the Conservatives are happy to throw around such phrases without any evidence, we are building the resilient system of the future, and we will get on with doing that.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  I thank the hon. Gentleman for his characteristic question. On the first point, let me just say that it was not I who said anything about what the margins were. I quoted the National Energy System Operator, which actually delivers in this country—and will quote it again for the benefit of the hon. Gentleman: “At no point were electricity supplies less than anticipated demand and our engineers were able to rebalance the system”. He can take or leave my words—I am not particularly bothered—but those are the words of the people who actually operate the energy system. On the hon. Gentleman’s final point, I absolutely agree with him on the importance of long-duration energy storage. That is why, for the first time in 40 years, this Government announced a new cap-and-floor regime to deliver new long-duration energy storage schemes. That is a huge step forward from the position under many previous Governments, and it will allow the building of the pumped hydro schemes and new innovative technologies that will deliver that energy storage. We are moving as fast as possible. I hope that he and his hon. Friends will support those decisions.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  The shadow Minister’s point would be well made were it not for the fact that it is completely untrue. If we look at the facts, the capacity market notice that he mentions was cancelled—

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  Let me repeat what I said a moment ago: even if we were to take much more gas from our continental shelf, it would still be traded on the international market. The reason why the right hon. Gentleman’s constituents and mine still face a cost of living crisis is our exposure to petrostates and dictators around the world. He would clearly like to expose us to them even more, and I think that the Conservatives would support him in that, but we want to get ourselves off the rollercoaster of volatile fossil fuels and deliver a clean power system that is cheaper in the long run and delivers energy security. That is what is best for consumers, and for all our constituents.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  These are commercial decisions for Centrica, although if it brings those decisions to us, we will of course look at them. Let me reiterate that the UK has a robust set of storage facilities to ensure security of supply. Rough is one of them, but at moments such as this, in the winter, it is not the most important, because it is the slowest to move gas into the system. The remainder are in an entirely robust state and will continue to deliver, but as I have said, what it chooses to do with its site is a commercial matter for Centrica.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  Let me say two things to the right hon. Gentleman. First, our approach to China is that we will co-operate when it is in our interest to do so, and will challenge when necessary. That is the point that the Chancellor is making. Secondly, the way to ensure that what he describes does not happen, and that we build as much as possible in this country, is to build an industrial base in this country and to bring clean power jobs to the UK. The last Government failed to do that. We are driving forward an industrial strategy that will ensure that the jobs that arise from the clean power plan that we designed are in this country. The Opposition can either support that or oppose it.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  That is a very good question. I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving me a second chance to reiterate that we inherited a whole series of plans that were not delivered. We have moved forward as quickly as possible to deliver significant projects, but we have also moved forward the competition on small modular reactors. [ Interruption. ] The shadow Minister says, “All you had to do was sign it off.” Maybe he forgets the state in which he left some of his policies when he departed office.

• 13 Jan 2025 · Gas Storage Levels · Hansard source

  More

  Conservative Members ask, “When?” —they had 14 years in power, and in 14 years did not build a single new nuclear project. The former Minister for nuclear, the hon. Member for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (Andrew Bowie), loves to shout about all the consultations that he launched, but he did not build a single new nuclear power station. My hon. Friend is right to make the point that we should move forward with nuclear—we want to see nuclear projects move forward as quickly as possible. My hon. Friend the Minister for nuclear is moving forward with two of the biggest projects, as well as the small modular reactor competition. We are quite rightly going through a process to ensure that it is as robust as possible, but we will have more to say in due course.

• 7 Jan 2025 · Draft Electricity Capacity Mechanism (Amendment) Regulations 2024 · Hansard source

  More

  I thank the shadow Minister for his support. I have no doubt that in 2025 we will have many debates on the “Clean Power 2030” action plan, and I look forward to hearing his support for our work. As I said in opening the debate, the draft regulations are technical in nature. They are about ensuring security of supply long into the future, and I hope the Committee will support them today. Question put and agreed to.

• 7 Jan 2025 · Draft Electricity Capacity Mechanism (Amendment) Regulations 2024 · Hansard source

  More

  I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Electricity Capacity Mechanism (Amendment) Regulations 2024. Good morning and happy new year to all members of the Committee. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship this morning, Mr Efford. The instrument revokes and alters several provisions of the assimilated regulation 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity relating to the capacity market, which from now on I shall refer to as the assimilated electricity regulation. Before I outline the provisions of the draft regulations, I shall briefly give some context. Great Britain’s capacity market was introduced in 2014. It is designed to ensure that sufficient electricity capacity is available to meet future predicted demand, to maintain security of electricity supply. It is our main tool for that purpose, providing all forms of existing and new-build capacity with the right incentives to be on the system when we need them. It covers generation, storage, consumer-led flexibility and interconnection capacity. Capacity markets auctions are held annually one year and four years ahead of delivery to ensure that we have supply when we need it and to meet future peak demand in a range of scenarios, based on advice from the capacity market delivery body, the National Energy System Operator. Since its introduction, the capacity market has contributed to investment in just under 19 GW of new, flexible capacity needed to replace older, less efficient plant as we transition to the net zero economy. The capacity market was originally approved under European Union state aid rules for a period of 10 years. Following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, a requirement in EU law for approval of up to 10 years was brought into our domestic law as part of the assimilated electricity regulation. To date, the capacity market has been successful in ensuring that Great Britain has adequate electricity capacity to meet demand, and it continues to be required to maintain security of supply and investor confidence. This will be increasingly important as further sectors of the economy are decarbonised through the transition to net zero, increasing demand for electricity. The draft regulations revoke and alters certain provisions relating to capacity mechanisms in the assimilated electricity regulation, including article 21(8), which requires that “Capacity mechanisms shall be temporary and shall be approved for no longer than 10 years”, and other references to such mechanisms being temporary. The draft instrument also revokes several provisions that require minor correction following changes made for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, or that impose requirements that are no longer considered to be necessary. We are making these changes now because of the ongoing need for the capacity market to ensure sufficient investment in reliable electricity capacity. The domestic subsidy control regime was introduced after our withdrawal from the EU. It does not require subsidy schemes to be granted an approval or to be limited for a specified period. The approval requirement in the assimilated electricity regulation does not, therefore, reflect our post-EU exit arrangements. It is of course important to keep the capacity market under review, and there are several controls in domestic legislation, such as the Secretary of State’s discretion not to hold auctions, as well as a statutory requirement to review the capacity market every five years, which provides an opportunity to review the need for the scheme. They will all be retained in the domestic capacity market legislative framework. The draft instrument revokes and alters certain provisions related to capacity mechanisms in the assimilated electricity regulation, including the requirement for an approval lasting no longer than 10 years and references to capacity mechanisms being temporary. The aim is to ensure that our domestic legislative arrangements reflect the continued operation of the capacity market, which is Great Britain’s main mechanism for ensuring security of electricity supply. I commend the draft regulations to the Committee.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Topical Questions · Hansard source

  More

  My hon. Friend is right to suggest that offshore wind, especially floating offshore wind, will play a critical role in our pathway to clean power. We will consider any option to ensure that we get many “test and demonstrate” projects through to delivery, and we will say more in coming weeks about what the next round of contracts for difference will look like.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Topical Questions · Hansard source

  More

  My hon. Friend makes an important point about rolling out charging infrastructure to all parts of the country, and we are working on that with colleagues in the Department for Transport. Local distribution networks in rural areas are incredibly important, and introducing greater access to the grid—including through Ofgem’s approval of £22 billion to improve distribution networks—will enable us to roll out EV infrastructure in rural areas throughout the country.

• 17 Dec 2024 · New Energy Infrastructure: Community Benefit Scheme · Hansard source

  More

  We have made clear, through the clean power action plan that we announced last week, that where communities host clean energy infrastructure, we will ensure that they benefit from it. There are many options in that area, including community funds and direct support for households, and we are exploring all those options to ensure that communities can benefit from the clean power mission.

• 17 Dec 2024 · New Energy Infrastructure: Community Benefit Scheme · Hansard source

  More

  My hon. Friend asks an extremely important question. All communities should benefit from the transformation that we want to make to the energy system. Part of the answer is improving how we use smart systems right across the energy system, so that people have much more consumer-led flexibility in their options—we are moving forward with that. In the clean power action plan that we published last week, we committed to doing much more to give people the power to take advantage of some of the opportunities she mentions.

• 17 Dec 2024 · New Energy Infrastructure: Community Benefit Scheme · Hansard source

  More

  Communities are, and will always be, able to speak about the plans for their local area, and to contribute to consultations and planning applications—we will not change anything about that. However, it is important to say that nationally important infrastructure will need to be built somewhere if we are to have the clean power future and energy security that everybody in this country needs. I gently say to the hon. Lady that, even in the most extreme statistics, less than 1% of land in this country would be used to build for solar. Either the Conservatives are in favour of keeping us on the rollercoaster of volatile fossil fuels, or they are in favour of building clean power. Her party used to be in favour of net zero, but now it seems to be running away from it at speed.

• 17 Dec 2024 · New Energy Infrastructure: Community Benefit Scheme · Hansard source

  More

  I cannot comment on the specific details of the case. However, I would like to know more about why the hon. Gentleman’s community might not benefit, because the aim is for all communities affected by hosting infrastructure to benefit in different ways. We are looking at the options—be they money off bills, or the community benefit funds that exist at the moment—as we work through the answers to the consultation launched by the previous Government. However, we are clear that if communities host infrastructure that is nationally important and benefits the whole country, they should benefit from doing so.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Community Energy Projects · Hansard source

  More

  The hon. Gentleman makes an incredibly important point about how local community groups can benefit from not just hosting the community energy, but from being able to sell locally. We have had a number of conversations on this topic already. I most recently met the community energy contact group, which does a lot of work to look at what regulations there might be, and we are happy to look at any proposals that come forward. We want to see a revolution in community energy right across the country so that more communities can benefit.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Community Energy Projects · Hansard source

  More

  As my hon. Friend knows, we have met Unite on a number of occasions over the past few months since Petroineos made the disappointing decision to follow through on its closure plans for the Grangemouth refinery. It is important that we look at every possible option, and we have done. It is also important that the Government are clear that we want to see a long-term sustainable future for the refinery site. That is why we invested in Project Willow, which at the moment is coming up with credible investable propositions for the site. We want to protect the workers and do whatever we can to ensure a just transition at Grangemouth and for industry right across the country, but those options need to be long-term and sustainable so that we do not drive workers back into this process again a few years down the line. We are committed to ensuring that we invest in long-term sustainable propositions for the site, and of course we will meet anyone and discuss any propositions to help make that happen.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Community Energy Projects · Hansard source

  More

  It will not surprise the House that I agree wholeheartedly with my hon. Friend, who, as always, makes an incredibly important point. He is right that stability is key, but so too is this Government’s commitment to invest in community energy. We have committed to upwards of 8 GW of energy from community sources over the course of this Parliament up to 2030. That commitment ensures not just that we have an energy mix where communities benefit, but that they benefit from the economic and social advantages of owning the energy they produce.