Luke Evans MP: speeches
467 published records · newest first.
Speeches
- 7 Oct 2024 · NHS Performance: Darzi Investigation · Hansard source
More
rose —
- 7 Oct 2024 · NHS Performance: Darzi Investigation · Hansard source
More
It is interesting that Lord Darzi chose 2010, because there were some good points in what the Labour Government put in place, but there was also the problem of Mid Staffs. We had the Medical Training Application Service fiasco around medical careers, for which Patricia Hewitt had to apologise, and we had the £11 billion IT project that was put in place and has now failed as well. These things shape the NHS, and when we are trying to come up with solutions, they impact on the way that doctors, leaders and politicians come together. Does my right hon. Friend have suggestions for how we can take the politics out of this debate, enabling us to have a sensible debate on reform, which I think both sides of this House would like to see?
- 7 Oct 2024 · NHS Performance: Darzi Investigation · Hansard source
More
Will my right hon. Friend give way?
- 12 Sept 2024 · Business of the House · Hansard source
More
I would be grateful for some help and advice from the Leader of the House. When the winter fuel announcement was made, I wrote to the Treasury and was told three times no, it was a Department for Work and Pensions issue. Following that logic, when it came to VAT on school fees, I wrote to the Department for Education, and much to my surprise it told me that assessing its impact was a Treasury issue. I am therefore stuck on a merry-go-round of trying to find out how this policy, which is due to be introduced in January, will impact on my constituents. Will she advise me on how I can do that, and would she be kind enough to ask the Education Secretary to meet me to discuss the impact on my constituents of VAT going on private school fees?
- 10 Sept 2024 · Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange · Hansard source
More
For me, that was the key deficit when we made our appeal to the inspectorate. It seems like that has been upheld because, although there are the environmental and infrastructure impacts that will hurt our communities, the fundamental premise of what was being put forward was faulty because the information simply was not there and there was a hostile approach from some of those statutory bodies that made getting information out really difficult. Does my hon. Friend believe that that is the reason why this should not go ahead? We cannot even make a judgment call on that basis, and that fits with what the Planning Inspectorate has come out to say—that this should not go ahead.
- 10 Sept 2024 · Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange · Hansard source
More
I, too, have constituents who are grossly concerned about this matter. Although it is, I say cautiously, good news that the decision has been delayed, part of what the Secretary of State seems to be saying is that the impact locally outweighs the benefit to the nation. That is what I myself and all the organisations and local people involved have been saying. Therefore, the question remains as to why a delay will change that position. Does my hon. Friend have any thoughts as to what the reason might be, and on what we can do to get an answer before the end of March?
- 10 Sept 2024 · Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange · Hansard source
More
I am grateful to my hon. Friend, who has made some fantastic points. One of the key points is the Planning Inspectorate report. Many members of the public felt that the development was a done deal and something being done to them. Can I thank the Planning Inspectorate, which is now minded to refuse consent? Our communities have been heard. We know the deficits, have seen the deficits and have now proved those deficits. I hope that that will go some way towards the Secretary of State making the right decision. But there is anxiety now, given the very unusual delay of several months. Minister, how can we allay fears that this will all be ridden roughshod over, given the unusual nature of what we have in place?
- 10 Sept 2024 · Winter Fuel Payment · Hansard source
More
Maybe in two minutes, this debate can best be summed up with a lesser-known fable: the farmer and the viper. A farmer was walking through his field. It was very cold in the winter, and he found a viper just under the bushes. The viper was cold, limp, and almost dead. The farmer knew it was poisonous, but he felt compassion for the creature, picked it up and put it in his pocket. As the creature became warm, it reverted to type and bit him and, as he died in that field, he said, “I got what I deserved. I shouldn’t have shown kindness to a scoundrel.” That rings true, because after 14 years of the Labour party being out in the cold, the pensioners of this country backed Labour into government, under an impression created by the Prime Minister. Only in May 2024, he goaded our Government, asking “Will the Prime Minister now rule out taking pensioners’ winter fuel payments off them?” —[ Official Report , 1 May 2024; Vol. 749, c. 255.] If we scratch the surface a little bit deeper, though, we find that, on 25 March 2014, the now Chancellor said that “We are the party who have said that we will cut the winter fuel allowance for the richest pensioners and means-test that benefit to save money” —[ Official Report , 25 March 2014; Vol. 578, c. 174-175.] so this is not a response to a concocted black hole. This was a choice—as Laura Kuenssberg pointed out, it was a choice to pay the unions on the back of our pensioners. The public are not stupid. The cartoonist Matt sums it up perfectly when he says, “Surprisingly, Robin Hood, nobody likes your plan to steal from pensioners to give to train drivers.” I was in the Chamber last week when the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero said that Conservative Members should “show a bit of bravery—even break the Whip and stand out from the crowd.” —[ Official Report , 5 September 2024; Vol. 753, c. 461.] I am disappointed that Labour Members did not take that advice, with only one Labour MP doing so.
- 10 Sept 2024 · Winter Fuel Payment · Hansard source
More
On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I seek your guidance. I was under the impression that in the Chamber we should refer to Members, Friends or even the constituency. Is that correct?
- 9 Sept 2024 · SEND Provision · Hansard source
More
In Leicestershire, special educational needs has been a real problem that I have seen in my constituency. The last Government made it one of the trailblazers to come together and trial some of the new things that could be done in special educational needs, and we started to see some progress in that. Will the Secretary of State meet me and the other Leicestershire MPs to discuss how we can take that forward, so we can get better provision for Hinckley and Bosworth and for Leicestershire?
- 5 Sept 2024 · Business of the House · Hansard source
More
In Leicestershire, we have fantastic optometrists and opticians. Will the Leader of the House ask the Prime Minister whether it is just glasses that they need to give to get a full-access pass to No. 10, or do they need to give suits as well?
- 2 Sept 2024 · Technology in Public Services · Hansard source
More
Could the Secretary of State explain what that means in reality for the Cabinet Office and the role that DSIT now has? Who has the organisational responsibility and the control over what goes on in Whitehall and his Department?
- 2 Sept 2024 · Technology in Public Services · Hansard source
More
The Secretary of State is making a fine maiden speech in his start at the Dispatch Box. As a previously practising doctor, I know that one thing that could really help is using some of the AI we see coming forward in the back office. The previous Government committed to a £3.4 billion NHS productivity plan. Are the Government still committed to taking that forward, because that investment would have significant benefits for staff and patients?
- 2 Sept 2024 · Technology in Public Services · Hansard source
More
rose —
- 18 Jul 2024 · Foreign Affairs and Defence · Hansard source
More
I am grateful to the shadow Foreign Secretary for his comments. One duty of the Opposition is to point out blind spots. We are talking about security, but one thing that was not mentioned in the King’s Speech was food security. For a rural community like mine, which has an 85% agricultural base, food security is really important. We have seen the attacks on Ukraine and the grain coming out of it. What can my right hon. Friend do in opposition to hold the Government to account to ensure we have food security on these isles?
- 17 Jul 2024 · Debate on the Address · Hansard source
More
Will the Prime Minister give way on that point?
- 17 Jul 2024 · Debate on the Address · Hansard source
More
Will the Prime Minister give way?
Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →