Lewis Atkinson MP: speeches

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026

How these years work

Our reporting years run from 4 July to 3 July, starting with the 2024 general election. They are not official parliamentary sessions. Office costs keep IPSA’s April–March financial years. Records may cover only part of a year; a missing record does not mean no work was done.

Read what this MP said, asked and contributed in Parliament.

1 published records · newest first.

Speeches

  • 22 Jun 2026 · Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Newborn Screening Test · Hansard source
    More

    I thank the hon. Member for making one of his excellent interventions. Clearly health is a devolved matter in Northern Ireland and Wales, where screening is also not available, but the hon. Member is absolutely right. It would be difficult to explain to parents anywhere in the UK why this screening is increasingly standard practice internationally but is not available in every nation of the United Kingdom. The petitioners are clear that all the conditions necessary to begin screening have been met. The test exists, the treatments exist and the evidence tells us that screening would save both lives and money. In the UK, screening is overseen by the independent UK National Screening Committee, which gives recommendations to Ministers. I was unable to meet with the committee in preparation for the debate, but I am sure that the Minister has had the benefit of its advice. I recognise, as we all must, that the committee’s independence matters. However, its decision making and the way in which it balances risk, evidence and benefit must be subject to ministerial oversight. In this case in particular, there are questions about how those three elements have been balanced, and specifically about how far the committee seemingly required NHS-specific evidence when significant international evidence already exists. When the National Screening Committee reviewed SMA for potential inclusion in the screening programme in 2018, the committee did not recommend screening, but campaigners like SMA UK did not walk away; they kept on doing the work. New cost-effectiveness modelling commissioned by the screening committee and published last year finds that screening for SMA is likely to be lifesaving and cost-effective.

Explore activity by topic or department

Contributions by debate topic

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained.

View as listCommunities and local government: 27Communities and local government27Culture, media and sport: 13Culture, media and sport13Defence and foreign affairs: 4Defence and foreign affairs4Democracy and constitution: 33Democracy and constitution33Economy and business: 15Economy and business15Education and skills: 4Education and skills4Environment and energy: 5Environment and energy5Health and care: 22Health and care22Housing and planning: 7Housing and planning7Immigration and borders: 5Immigration and borders5Justice and policing: 7Justice and policing7Social security and pensions: 1Social security and pensions1Transport: 6Transport6Unclassified: 15Unclassified15
What this shows and doesn't show
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained. Published records do not measure effort or effectiveness. Methodology.
Department or topicPublished records
Communities and local government27
Culture, media and sport13
Defence and foreign affairs4
Democracy and constitution33
Economy and business15
Education and skills4
Environment and energy5
Health and care22
Housing and planning7
Immigration and borders5
Justice and policing7
Social security and pensions1
Transport6
Unclassified15

Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →