Grahame Morris MP: written questions
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026
How these years work
Our reporting years run from 4 July to 3 July, starting with the 2024 general election. They are not official parliamentary sessions. Office costs keep IPSA’s April–March financial years. Records may cover only part of a year; a missing record does not mean no work was done.
Read what this MP said, asked and contributed in Parliament.
209 published records · newest first.
Written questions
Ministry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15304More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department has taken to assess and mitigate risks of bias or discrimination arising from the use of automated decision-making systems.
Answer: Within the Ministry of Defence (MOD), decisions supported by automated systems which involve personal data and produce significant effects are subject to appropriate human oversight and review. The MOD’s Data Protection Impact Assessment process identifie...
Answered 10 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15303More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps has the Department taken to assess and mitigate risks of bias or discrimination arising from the use of automated decision-making systems.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Justice: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15302More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps has the Department taken to assess and mitigate risks of bias or discrimination arising from the use of automated decision-making systems.
Answer: Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in t...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15301More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps has the Department taken to assess and mitigate risks of bias or discrimination arising from the use of automated decision-making systems.
Answer: Where the Department uses automated decision-making systems that process personal data, these processing activities are required to be assessed via the completion of a Data Protection Impact Assessment to support compliance with data protection law and as...
Answered 7 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15300More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
Answer: The Ministry of Defence (MOD) engages with Trade Unions on all key matters that impact staff. We have engaged with all recognised Trade Unions where we have pursued automation in systems that impact staff employment and will continue such engagement when ...
Answered 13 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15299More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Justice: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15298More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
Answer: Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in t...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15297More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
Answer: The Department holds regular consultations with its trade unions on all matters concerning the workforce, including its future strategy for the use of Artificial Intelligence.
Answered 7 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15296More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, to what extent are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline, or allocation of work.
Answer: The Ministry of Defence (MOD) engages with Trade Unions on all key matters that impact staff. We have engaged with all recognised Trade Unions where we have pursued automation in systems that impact staff employment and will continue such engagement when ...
Answered 13 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordArtificial Intelligence: Civil ServiceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15295More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, to what extent are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline, or allocation of work.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordCivil Service: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15294More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, to what extent are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline, or allocation of work.
Answer: Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in t...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15293More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, to what extent are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline, or allocation of work.
Answer: The Department is not using automated decision-making systems in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline or the allocation of work.
Answered 7 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15292More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.
Answer: The Ministry of Defence (MOD) ensures substantive and effective human oversight of automated decisions involving personal data through meaningful human involvement in the process. Automated outputs undergo thorough human review and do not form the sole ba...
Answered 17 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15291More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Justice: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15290More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.
Answer: Reforms to the solely auromated decision-making (ADM) rules in the Data (Use and Access) Act make clear that these are decisions without any meaningful human involvement. This is to prevent ‘rubber stamping’ of decisions qualifying as having a ‘human in t...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15289More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective, rather than limited to formal or nominal review.
Answer: Where the Department uses automated decision-making systems that process personal data, these processing activities are required to be assessed via the completion of a Data Protection Impact Assessment to support compliance with data protection law and as...
Answered 7 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15288More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how does the Department define and ensure meaningful human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated systems.
Answer: Within the Ministry of Defence (MOD), in relation to decisions supported or made by automated systems which involve personal data, meaningful human involvement requires that automated outputs undergo thorough and appropriate human review. This includes en...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15287More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, how does the Department define and ensure meaningful human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated systems.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Justice: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15286More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how does the Department define and ensure meaningful human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated systems.
Answer: The Government does not wish to be overly prescriptive by defining meaningful human involvement, as it is context specific. ICO guidance can be more appropriate than legislation for providing such a definition or interpretation, given guidance can be more...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 2 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 15285More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how does the Department define and ensure meaningful human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated systems.
Answer: What constitutes meaningful human involvement will vary depending on the specific use case, so the Department considers and assesses the nature of human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated decisions on a case-by-case basis supported by...
Answered 7 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 1 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 14815More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
Answer: The Ministry of Defence (MOD)’s public Privacy Notice explains when personal data may be used in Automated Decision Making (ADM), the rights available to individuals, and how concerns can be raised. Where the law requires, individuals affected by decision...
Answered 10 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordData Protection: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for Science, Innovation and TechnologyTabled 1 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 14814More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
Answer: The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology does not currently use solely automated decisions-making (ADM) with legal or similarly significant effects on individuals. However, should the department decide to use solely ADM in the future, it must...
Answered 9 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Justice: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of JusticeTabled 1 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 14813More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
Answer: The UK’s data protection legislation applies to the private and public sector alike. Where significant decisions are taken solely based on automated processing, Departments must provide safeguards including rights to information, challenge and human inter...
Answered 14 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordDepartment for Transport: Artificial IntelligenceDepartment for TransportTabled 1 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 14812More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
Answer: The Department's Personal Information Charter sets out how individuals will be informed about decisions that have been made partially or wholly by automated means, the safeguards, and the information rights that apply. The Department also has an internal ...
Answered 6 Jul 2026
Original Parliament recordMinistry of Defence: Artificial IntelligenceMinistry of DefenceTabled 1 Jul 2026AnsweredUIN 14811More
Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how individuals are informed that decisions have been taken in (a) whole and (b) part by automated means in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
Answer: The Ministry of Defence (MOD) ensures compliance with legal requirements regarding Automated Decision-Making (ADM) through a range of measures. The MOD provides clear information about its use of ADM in its public Privacy Notice. When personal data is pro...
Answered 13 Jul 2026
Original Parliament record
Explore activity by topic or department
Written questions by answering department
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. One record per UIN and tabled date; the named department is not a measure of answer quality.
View as listWhat this shows and doesn't show
Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →