Desmond Swayne MP: speeches 2024
40 published records · newest first.
Speeches
- 15 Oct 2024 · House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill · Hansard source
More
At least those peers were elected by someone, unlike all the other placemen.
- 14 Oct 2024 · Topical Questions · Hansard source
More
T7. Does the Secretary of State share my incredulity that he has not been told the cost of leasing the facilities in the Chagos?
- 14 Oct 2024 · Points of Order · Hansard source
More
Further to those points of order, Mr Speaker. Alex Salmond was a great friend at university and also in this House. Despite political differences, I speak from personal experience when I say that he was a man capable of very great kindness. I shall certainly miss him, and Moira certainly has my condolences.
- 9 Oct 2024 · Renters’ Rights Bill · Hansard source
More
Changing tenants involves significant expense for both tenant and landlord—my interests can be found in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests—and the ability of a tenant to end a tenancy after two months presents a significant risk to the landlord, particularly in the student rental market, where re-letting a property within the academic year can present a considerable difficulty. Will the Secretary of State at least consider amendments in Committee to address that issue?
- 8 Oct 2024 · Energy Social Tariffs · Hansard source
More
Would it not have been better to put that proper package of support in place before the Government withdrew the winter fuel allowance from so many pensioners?
- 7 Oct 2024 · British Indian Ocean Territory: Negotiations · Hansard source
More
How does the cost of leasing compare with the savings that the Government are making on the winter fuel allowance?
- 10 Sept 2024 · Criminal Justice System: Progress of Cases · Hansard source
More
Perhaps too many barristers have become politicians, but however caused, how will the Minister address the shortage at the criminal Bar?
- 10 Sept 2024 · Criminal Justice System: Progress of Cases · Hansard source
More
13. What steps she is taking to help reduce the time taken for criminal cases to be heard at court.
- 30 Jul 2024 · Building Homes · Hansard source
More
New Forest district council has recently had its local plan agreed on the basis of local housing need. When will it be required to reopen that assessment on the basis of the right hon. Lady’s new algorithm, and when will the target become mandatory?
- 29 Jul 2024 · Public Spending: Inheritance · Hansard source
More
When the Chancellor’s legislation enables illegal entrants to leave their current accommodation, where will they go?
- 24 Jul 2024 · Windsor Framework Agreement · Hansard source
More
6. Whether he plans to review the Windsor framework agreement.
- 24 Jul 2024 · Windsor Framework Agreement · Hansard source
More
Will the Secretary of State commit to all the provisions of the “Safeguarding the Union” agreement?
- 23 Jul 2024 · Immigration and Home Affairs · Hansard source
More
It is a great pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Dulwich and West Norwood (Helen Hayes). I spent 13 years on these Benches in opposition, and I know how frustrating it can be. The reality is that when the sheer size of our defeat became apparent, I had some difficulty in coming to terms with it. In order to characterise it, I do not think one can do better than our late colleague Peter Brooke, who, when describing a similar calamity, said, “the battle of Isandlwana is lost, so now begins the defence of the mission station at Rorke’s Drift.” I had no doubt that the Government were always going to abandon the Rwanda scheme—they made that absolutely clear, and they have every right to do it—but I do think that the House will ultimately come to regret not having such a deterrent to hand. Had it been allowed to develop, it could have been such a deterrent. It was never a silver bullet but always part of a complex jigsaw of measures, of which, of course, the holy grail would be returns agreements. The previous Government should be utterly congratulated on the returns agreement they made with Albania, which has been a tremendous success. Such agreements are hard to come by. I remember being sent to negotiate with President Ghani in Afghanistan to try to get him to take a more helpful approach, given the blood and treasure that we were expending on behalf of his regime and the people of Afghanistan. He turned to me and said, “My priority is the young men and women who are taking the battle to the Taliban, and you want me to give time and resource to those people who’ve chosen to run away?” Well, it was a fair point—of course, ultimately he ran away himself. But I had little more success in negotiations on returns agreements with other Commonwealth members. These agreements are extraordinarily hard to achieve. I think that we would have wanted a third country where we could have settled people, because ultimately our ability to do so will be finite and limited. I want to draw attention to what the Prime Minister said yesterday in his statement, when he pointed out that he had just authorised a very significant increase in money to regimes in Africa. Ultimately, that has to be the long-term answer—the very long-term answer. We made an agreement back in 1970 with the wealthy countries of the world to spend 0.7% of our national income on international development in the economies of those countries from which so many people are now coming and will continue to come as long as the incentive of life being so much better here exists. It took us until the coalition Government in 2011 to actually honour that commitment to spending 0.7% of our national income, and we subsequently abandoned it—or certainly reduced it. If all the nations that had entered that agreement had honoured it and delivered it when they made it, perhaps the flow of population from the developing world would have abated substantially and we would be dealing with a different situation. Ultimately, it is all about jobs. Take Zaatari, the huge refugee camp on the borders of Jordan and Syria: a great city now, made from scratch. Those who are accommodated in Zaatari will find that the housing provided by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is of a substantially better quality than that available in many cities and shanty towns across the world. They will find that the World Food Programme will feed them, and their children will be educated by the UN children’s agencies. Perhaps most importantly, security will be supplied by the Jordanian forces and be of a much greater standard than they might enjoy in many other parts of the world. Despite all those advantages, people from Zaatari will spend every penny they have, and borrow, in order to escape and get the one thing that Zaatari cannot supply them: a livelihood and a future for their family. That is the driver of so much migration. Ultimately, we must return to that original policy, restore the 0.7%, and start building for the long term a world that is much more secure as a consequence of the economic developments available in those other places.
- 23 Jul 2024 · Immigration and Home Affairs · Hansard source
More
That is absolutely right, but we did not do that. We did not spend our money in that way. We supported people under desperate regimes, not by giving money to those regimes but by providing sustenance through third parties and NGOs, which delivered that. Some of the greatest damage done by much of our own press was how our international development aid effort was painted as destructive in the way that was just described. It never was. I return to my original point: we cannot take everybody, and we certainly needed somewhere else where they could have gone. Rwanda struck me as somewhere that that possibility could blossom.
- 22 Jul 2024 · NATO and European Political Community Meetings · Hansard source
More
Why do we continue to limit Ukraine’s ability to take the fight to Russia?
Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →