David Pinto-Duschinsky MP: speeches

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026

How these years work

Our reporting years run from 4 July to 3 July, starting with the 2024 general election. They are not official parliamentary sessions. Office costs keep IPSA’s April–March financial years. Records may cover only part of a year; a missing record does not mean no work was done.

Read what this MP said, asked and contributed in Parliament.

2 published records · newest first.

Speeches

  • 8 Sept 2025 · Indefinite Leave to Remain · Hansard source
    More

    My hon. Friend is right that the policy is a source of great concern to many people. That is why I welcome the willingness of the Government and the Minister to listen and their decision to consult on the measures in the White Paper, including this one. Retaining the five-year ILR period for BNO holders who have already settled here would be a strong reaffirmation of the solemn compact we have made with the people of Hong Kong. I believe it need not have huge ramifications for the broader migration system, exactly as my hon. Friend says, especially as I believe BNO holders constitute a unique case because of their special status. It would give certainty to almost 200,000 BNO passport holders who have made the UK their home. It would be a beacon of British leadership, and I hope we can find a way to support it.

  • 8 Sept 2025 · Indefinite Leave to Remain · Hansard source
    More

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir Jeremy. I join colleagues in thanking the Petitions Committee for securing this debate, and I thank Mr Li for instigating the BNO petition. I am here to speak about the BNO visa. Our debate today should have two starting points: first, an acknowledgment of the historic commitment that the UK made to the people of Hong Kong in the form of the BNO scheme, which is something that we should be intensely proud of, and secondly a recognition of the massive repression that we have seen in Hong Kong, particularly since the enactment of the national security law. Rights that were guaranteed to the people of Hong Kong by the 1984 Sino-British joint declaration have been cast aside. Hong Kong’s democracy has been replaced by a dictatorship, and its free press has been crushed. That is the context that has left many Hongkongers feeling that they have little choice but to leave, to seek freedom and a new life here in the UK.

Explore activity by topic or department

Contributions by debate topic

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained.

View as listCommunities and local government: 11Communities and local government11Culture, media and sport: 1Culture, media and sport1Defence and foreign affairs: 3Defence and foreign affairs3Democracy and constitution: 3Democracy and constitution3Economy and business: 12Economy and business12Education and skills: 2Education and skills2Health and care: 2Health and care2Housing and planning: 4Housing and planning4Immigration and borders: 2Immigration and borders2Justice and policing: 7Justice and policing7Social security and pensions: 11Social security and pensions11Transport: 4Transport4Unclassified: 11Unclassified11
What this shows and doesn't show
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained. Published records do not measure effort or effectiveness. Methodology.
Department or topicPublished records
Communities and local government11
Culture, media and sport1
Defence and foreign affairs3
Democracy and constitution3
Economy and business12
Education and skills2
Health and care2
Housing and planning4
Immigration and borders2
Justice and policing7
Social security and pensions11
Transport4
Unclassified11

Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →