Dan Tomlinson MP: speeches

Speeches

• 27 Apr 2026 · Draft Vaping Duty Stamps (Requirements, Reviews and Appeals) Regulations 2026 · Hansard source

  More

  I am not an expert on the differences in the health impacts, and I trust my hon. Friend’s expertise and experience in this space. However, the chief medical officer is clear that there are still health impacts, and he supports the changes we have made. It is worth highlighting that, although the vaping products duty will be introduced at the rate of £2.20 per 10 ml, we are increasing the duty on cigarettes so that the tax differential is maintained. I thank my hon. Friend for her interventions and the insight she has brought to today’s debate. On enforcement, HMRC is in the process of recruiting more than 300 new compliance officers. As the shadow Exchequer Secretary mentioned, £10 million of additional funding will be made available for Border Force. We are confident that the cost of implementing this measure will be outweighed many times over by the benefits to the Exchequer of the additional revenue it brings in. Unlike the one-off set-up costs, that additional revenue is there for the long term,. The vaping products duty will bring in £565 million by 2030. The shadow Exchequer Secretary is always right to mention the need for timely and up-to-date guidance, and I will press officials to make sure we get the guidance out as soon as we can if more clarity is required. When it comes to individual procurement decisions, I am aware of the case he mentioned. HMRC assures me that it followed robust and proper processes in that case, as it does in all procurement. The bids underwent thorough evaluation and assurance process, and we follow strict procurement rules when awarding contracts, ensuring value for money for taxpayers. As for the subject of HMRC enforcement action, we will make sure to enforce against the appropriate person or business in each relevant case. Question put and agreed to.

• 3 Feb 2026 · Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fifth sitting) · Hansard source

  More

  The shadow Exchequer Secretary invited the Economic Secretary to his constituency. Last week, he invited me to come on Valentine’s day to enjoy the bumper cars. I know the Economic Secretary is glad for the invite, but I am particularly glad for the one I received. Turning to the matter at hand, clauses 139 to 147 and schedule 15 establish the core framework of the carbon border adjustment mechanism, otherwise known as the CBAM— [ Interruption. ]

• 29 Jan 2026 · Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting) · Hansard source

  More

  We do not expect that the changes will result in significant cost changes. How ports that currently benefit from the inland border facilities choose to recover any costs is a commercial matter. It is worth noting that the ports have benefited from significant public investment that has already been made in the development and operation of inland border facilities since we left the EU. Question put and agreed to. Clause 109 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 110 Increases to rates of levy

• 29 Jan 2026 · Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting) · Hansard source

  More

  Clause 109 amends sections 20 and 20A of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 to update HMRC’s existing powers to require all ports to provide and fund customs infrastructure. Customs infrastructure is essential to protecting the UK by ensuring that risk-based checks on goods entering and leaving the country can take place. Provision of that infrastructure by ports is a long-standing requirement. When we left the EU, the Government funded and operated customs infrastructure at inland border facilities for ports that do not have enough space for this infrastructure within the port itself. Only two inland border facilities remain: Sevington inland border facility in Kent and Holyhead inland border facility in Wales. As confirmed in the border target operating model in autumn 2023, Government provision of these inland border facilities was always intended to be temporary. Clause 109 would, first, require the small number of ports assessed as having insufficient space on site for customs infrastructure to provide equivalent infrastructure at an offsite location, which must be approved by HMRC. Secondly, all ports will now be responsible for providing and funding the customs infrastructure required for border checks on goods. This levels the playing field between ports, bringing all ports into line with the long-standing model. I commend the clause to the Committee.

• 29 Jan 2026 · Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting) · Hansard source

  More

  Let me respond to some of the Opposition spokesman’s points. HMRC’s estimate of illicit trade is published annually in “Measuring tax gaps”, which are official statistics produced to the highest quality standards. They adhere to the values, principles and protocols set out in the UK Statistics Authority’s code of best practice for statistics and are regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation. HMRC is always looking for ways to strengthen them, but the Government consider them to be the most reliable estimates of illicit trade. As he set out, the figures produced by the tobacco industry or those working on its behalf cannot be regarded as a fully neutral assessment of the situation on the ground. The Opposition spokesman asked about the latest figures. The latest figures from the 2023-24 tax year are that the tobacco duty gap was 13.8%, equivalent to £1.4 billion. He is right that every penny not collected there is a penny not going towards public services. We need to continue to focus our efforts on what we can do to reduce that figure. He mentioned the work of the previous Government, and this Government will build on that. We will continue to work with Border Force to seize cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco. The Committee may be interested to know that in the 2023-24 tax year, HMRC and Border Force together seized 92,435 kg of hand-rolling tobacco. We are continuing to see what more we can do. HMRC and Border Force published a strategy in 2024 setting out the continued commitment to reduce the trade, with £100 million of funding in enforcement capability and £1.4 billion to recruit 5,000 compliance officers. I had not heard the Opposition spokesman’s point on trading standards before; I did not have the pleasure of serving on the Public Bill Committee of last year’s Finance Bill when he raised it. The Government’s policy position is as it stands, but I am always interested to hear policy ideas. I will take his point back to the Department. Question put and agreed to . Clause 87 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 88 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 89 Vehicle excise duty for light passenger or light goods vehicles etc Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.

• 16 Dec 2025 · Finance (No. 2) Bill · Hansard source

  More

  This Budget will lift thousands of children in Scotland out of poverty, because of decisions that we have made. This Government have made £10 billion more spending available to the Scottish Government, yet we still see public services failing up and down Scotland; the NHS is not working as well as it should north of the border.

• 1 Dec 2025 · Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Peru) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Romania) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Andorra) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Portuguese Republic) Order 2025 · Hansard source

  More

  It is a pleasure to serve on this Committee with you as Chair, Mr Swayne. The orders before the Committee give effect to the double taxation conventions, or DTCs, with Andorra, Peru, Portugal and Romania. Like all DTCs, these agreements will provide tax certainty to businesses and investors by removing double taxation and, importantly, without creating opportunities for the avoidance of tax. In doing so, they will remove barriers to cross-border trade and investment, support growth, and provide a clear and fair framework for taxing businesses that invest and trade across borders. That will benefit businesses and the economies of both the UK and our respective treaty partners. The DTCs are based mainly on the OECD model tax convention, which contains a set of internationally agreed principles and standards that make them easier for businesses to understand and tax administrations to apply. Those standards ensure that DTCs are not used to avoid or evade tax. They include a statement to that effect in the preamble, and are clear that it is not a purpose of a DTC to create opportunities for tax evasion and avoidance. The DTCs include a principal purpose test that denies treaty benefits in case of abuse. They also allow for the exchange of information between the UK and its treaty partners to facilitate tax transparency. Other anti-avoidance rules in the new treaties include a tie-breaker provision for determining corporate residence based on agreement between the competent authorities of the treaty partners. The orders include dispute resolution provisions, which provide that where a taxpayer considers that the DTC has not been applied correctly, they can present their case to either tax authority, allowing both countries to work together to resolve the issue. Together, those features strengthen our collective defences against tax avoidance and evasion while supporting cross-border trade, investment and mutual growth. I commend all the orders to the Committee.

• 1 Dec 2025 · Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Peru) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Romania) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Andorra) Order 2025 Draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Portuguese Republic)) Order 2025 · Hansard source

  More

  It is a pleasure to serve on this Committee with you as Chair, Mr Swayne. The orders before the Committee give effect to the double taxation conventions, or DTCs, with Andorra, Peru, Portugal and Romania. Like all DTCs, these agreements will provide tax certainty to businesses and investors by removing double taxation and, importantly, without creating opportunities for the avoidance of tax. In doing so, they will remove barriers to cross-border trade and investment, support growth, and provide a clear and fair framework for taxing businesses that invest and trade across borders. That will benefit businesses and the economies of both the UK and our respective treaty partners. The DTCs are based mainly on the OECD model tax convention, which contains a set of internationally agreed principles and standards that make them easier for businesses to understand and tax administrations to apply. Those standards ensure that DTCs are not used to avoid or evade tax. They include a statement to that effect in the preamble, and are clear that it is not a purpose of a DTC to create opportunities for tax evasion and avoidance. The DTCs include a principal purpose test that denies treaty benefits in case of abuse. They also allow for the exchange of information between the UK and its treaty partners to facilitate tax transparency. Other anti-avoidance rules in the new treaties include a tie-breaker provision for determining corporate residence based on agreement between the competent authorities of the treaty partners. The orders include dispute resolution provisions, which provide that where a taxpayer considers that the DTC has not been applied correctly, they can present their case to either tax authority, allowing both countries to work together to resolve the issue. Together, those features strengthen our collective defences against tax avoidance and evasion while supporting cross-border trade, investment and mutual growth. I commend all the orders to the Committee.