Andrew Pakes MP: speeches

Speeches

• 4 Feb 2025 · Apprenticeships · Hansard source

  More

  I agree with the hon. Lady. That is why I welcome the announcement in September last year by my right hon. Friends the Prime Minister and Education Secretary of a new growth and skills levy to replace the existing apprenticeship levy, and include new foundation apprenticeships. That will give young people a route into careers where the nation has skills gaps. It cannot be stated often or loudly enough that apprenticeships not only transform the lives of those who take them, but are vital to our economy and growth. Ministers’ single, unifying, animating purpose is to get the economy growing, and I wholeheartedly endorse that.

• 4 Feb 2025 · Apprenticeships · Hansard source

  More

  I very much agree with my hon. Friend. Before I came to Parliament, I was a union official at Prospect, which represents many workers in the defence sector and in Barrow, so I know full well the great expertise of apprentices in the defence sector. We need more of those apprenticeships for our national security and for new jobs. Growth will come because of a range of factors—we will secure inward investment and trade deals, shake up the planning system, boost infrastructure and back business—but a sure-fire way to stimulate growth is to invest in people’s skills, energy and talent. Just yesterday, I met level 3 to level 7 KPMG apprentices from all parts of the country who work together to bring new opportunities. It was brilliant to hear from Gaby from Peterborough, who told her own story and gave lessons for how to ensure that more young people in Peterborough get the same opportunities. That means nothing short of a revolution in our system of apprenticeships. I am proud that the previous Labour Government revitalised apprenticeships—the largest expansion in our history—and I welcome the cross-party support for innovation since then, including all-age apprenticeships and all-qualification approaches to workplace learning, but I am not satisfied. We need to address head-on why 900,000 young people across our country are not in education, employment or training; why young people cannot access the opportunities they need; and why the opportunities are not there in the first place. That matters in Peterborough, where we have seen falling apprenticeship numbers and rising levels of youth unemployment. Last Friday, I was pleased to co-host a NEETs summit with Peterborough college, Anglia Ruskin University Peterborough and local businesses and providers to look at how we can make apprenticeships work better in my constituency. We need to put rocket boosters under the number of firms that take on apprentices, not for altruistic reasons but because it makes smart business sense. We also need reform to ensure that apprenticeship standards work for businesses and learners. I ask the Minister to remove the artificial barriers to success of academic English and maths, and move quickly to business-ready, work-ready, functional skills where they matter. We are coming up to National Apprenticeship Week, and I want to address one other issue before I finish: not apprenticeships policy, but the cultural barriers. In too many parts of the UK, there is a hang-up about apprenticeships, and so many parts of the system are obsessed with university. Of course, we should value our world-class universities and celebrate the hard work of our university students. As a former president of the National Union of Students, of course I recognise the vital role that British universities play in our national story. However, apprenticeships should be seen as an equally valid alternative route, a legitimate way to gain skills and experience, and a vital contributor to our economic prosperity, and yet in public policy sometimes they are not. Why is that? I fear that there is still a snobbery about apprenticeships in the UK that is not found in competitor countries such as Germany and Sweden, which are more competitive. There is too often a lazy and misguided assumption that apprenticeships are second best to degrees, and that apprentices are lesser in comparison with undergraduates. We often use the phrase, “University is not for everyone,” as though university is the gold standard and apprenticeships are the also-ran for second-class kids. The English class system exerts itself and places people into boxes, limiting horizons, prejudicing futures and stifling ambitions. That must stop, not only for the good of the brilliant, energetic, ambitious young and not-so-young people who embark on apprenticeships, but for the economy and growth. We will not secure growth with one hand tied behind our back. Hardly any of the apprentices I have met say that their journey was made easier by careers support at school. That is why we need change in our careers service. We must make it easier for businesses to support learners and parents, and we need a step change in how we regard apprenticeships. We are coming up to National Apprenticeship Week. Let us be loud and proud about apprenticeships. Let us challenge the stigma, call out the snobs, and put apprenticeships centre stage in our policy making, economic mission and national culture.

• 4 Feb 2025 · Apprenticeships · Hansard source

  More

  I agree 100% with my hon. Friend. As we have discussed previously, we both want to make sure that jobs in theatre, the arts and creative industries are open to young people in our constituencies and across the country. We were the first country to pass a national apprenticeship Act when the Tudor Parliament enacted the Statute of Artificers in 1563. It is mind-boggling to think how much our society and economy have changed since then. What has not changed is the timeless requirement of educating the next generation, and ensuring that novices in the jobs market are set forth in the working world with all the pride and self-reliance of mastering a new occupation, profession or skill. Over the past few years, there have been various reports into the status, scale and success of apprenticeships. It is clear that the system is not working as it should be. In my view, it is a national disgrace that the number of apprenticeships fell under the last Government.

• 3 Feb 2025 · Topical Questions · Hansard source

  More

  T7. On Friday last week, we held our first NEETs—those not in education, employment or training—and youth opportunities summit in Peterborough, bringing together Peterborough college, Anglia Ruskin University Peterborough and employers to see how we can tackle our youth unemployment problem. Will the Secretary of State commit to working further with places such as Peterborough to ensure we can deliver decent apprenticeships and more opportunities for young people who need them?

• 17 Jan 2025 · Fireworks Bill · Hansard source

  More

  Like everyone else, I congratulate my hon. Friend on putting forward the Bill. Is she surprised to hear that this is one of the biggest issues that I come across in surgeries and emails? Over 750 people have contacted me about it since the election. She has spoken about the impact of fireworks on animals, children and people with neurodiverse conditions. I have been contacted by a number of veterans and others who are often traumatised or woken up by fireworks. On that basis, does she agree that her Bill is absolutely necessary at this stage?

• 16 Jan 2025 · Business of the House · Hansard source

  More

  We are a proud cathedral city. Everyone in Peterborough has a story to tell about our cathedral, whether it is attending a carol service, going to a graduation or community event, or even remembering the Foreign Secretary singing there as a chorister when he was a schoolboy. For over 900 years, our cathedral has been there for us. Now, in the words of the Very Rev. Chris Dalliston, our dean, we need to be there for the cathedral, because it has a funding crisis. Will the Leader of the House join me in wishing the cathedral well with its appeal, and ensure that we have time in this House to debate these wonderful places, which are not just of local importance but national heritage assets?

• 16 Jan 2025 · Middle East · Hansard source

  More

  My right hon. Friend is right that this is not a day for celebration; it is a day for prayer—prayer that this deal is seen through and prayer that hostages and ordinary Palestinians get a chance to rebuild their lives after the atrocities and horrors of the past 15 months. My right hon. Friend is right to say that this peace deal is fragile, but it is also right to say that many in the world, including in my community, think that the world community’s grasp on humanitarian values has been fragile these past 15 months. We have failed the hostages, failed the Palestinians and failed in the quest for peace by taking so long to do that. He will know that this issue is important to the community I represent. Nearly two years ago, the Foreign Secretary had lunch with me and some of my constituents, and we talked about previous crises where we have solved the crisis but given up on the peace. What reassurance can he give us that this time it will be different and the British Government will lead the way, once we get this deal in place, to ensure that there is a two-state solution and that dignity and respect are given to Israel and Palestine?

• 13 Jan 2025 · Artificial Intelligence Opportunities Action Plan · Hansard source

  More

  I thank the Secretary of State and his team for their vision and leadership on this critical issue. These exciting plans could help us to drive growth, create jobs and improve public services. Places like Peterborough could be at the heart of the silicon fens if we get this right. Critical to that will be the issue of skills in cities like mine—cities that were left behind for too long by the previous Government. Can the Secretary of State update and inform us on what progress his Department is making on assessing the UK skills gap when it comes to AI, and how we can ensure that growth benefits all parts of the country as we embark on this plan?

• 9 Jan 2025 · Water (Special Measures) Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) · Hansard source

  More

  As a new Member, it is a privilege to serve on a Bill Committee under your chairmanship, Mr Vickers—I hope I will get all of it right. I felt particularly moved to speak on these amendments and clause 1, given some of the earlier comments. I was a bit worried that we had been transported by the Opposition back to a previous Conservative age, because we seem to be being told that water customers have never had it so good—as one of their predecessors said—because of all the action that was taken. There has been a lot of talk about teeth. I ask the Minister to confirm that the Bill is about the dentistry that is needed to put more teeth into the water sector. When she responds, will she identify whether the clauses that the Government have tabled help to address some of the very real anger that my constituents feel about the way they have been ghosted and treated by the big water companies and the behaviour of some of the senior leadership? Representing a seat with Anglian Water, which I think applies to some other Members present, I place it on the record that there is real frustration at the performance and actions of such a large company when at the same time as more than 3,000 hours of sewage were being dumped into rivers around my area, the fens and John Clare county, we saw the Anglian Water chief executive receiving £1.3 million in a package of pay and bonuses, despite that poor performance. The anger and the desire and drive of this Government, but also the public, to see action is palpable, so I very much welcome the Bill and I seek clarity on that. It is absolutely right, as the Government have outlined, that we have a fast Bill to get these teeth and this emergency dental treatment delivered quickly, so that we can come back and put the braces on for the rest of the water sector— [Laughter.] I think I am running out of places where that analogy can go; it is getting very dangerous. When we get the Cunliffe report and others, we will look at some of the bigger issues for the water sector, but I am very concerned by that £1.3 million. I serve as a member of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee and I share the concerns expressed by my hon. Friend the Member for Hastings and Rye that when we directly asked Ofwat whether it had the dental tools to challenge and put the surgery on to the water companies, Ofwat was very clear that it did not. I specifically asked the chief executive and leadership of Ofwat about another bête noire of the debate, which is Thames Water. Up until March 2024, in those three months, the chief executive gave themself a £195,000 bonus. Since 2020, we have seen £41 million given to water company chief executives in bonuses and incentives, so can the Minister reassure this Committee that the clauses that the Government have put forward will help to restore trust and put in place initial measures so that we can get on with this, end the delay, take action and start to put right the problems that the Government have inherited, and then look at the wider issues when we get the report later in the year?

• 7 Jan 2025 · Northern Gaza · Hansard source

  More

  May I put on record my thanks to the Minister for the care and concern about the situation that he shows Members? Yet every time we meet, the situation seems to have become more desperate, even in recent weeks, with babies freezing, the continued bombing of hospitals and real concerns about the annexation of Gaza. Over Christmas, I met constituents with friends and family in Gaza. Those people are increasingly despondent about whether the killing will ever stop, whether hostages will ever get to see their loved ones again and whether international law matters at all. With the change in world leadership in the coming weeks, what reassurances can the Minister give the House that the UK will continue to lead the world community for peace, an immediate ceasefire and, most importantly, getting aid in where it is needed now?

• 17 Dec 2024 · Trades and Apprenticeships · Hansard source

  More

  It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Betts. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth North (Amanda Martin) on securing this debate. It is a privilege to follow both her and the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon), who have given us such a passionate case for the importance of apprenticeships to our economy, to young people and to those changing their careers. I will put on record that I am co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on apprenticeships. I also refer to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests: I am on the skills advisory board for Google’s artificial intelligence campus, looking at new skills and new technologies. Just last month, I welcomed the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to Peterborough college to visit apprentices and businesses and launch the Government’s “Get Britain Working” White Paper. I had the great privilege to meet excellent businesses and apprentices doing brilliant work, including EML, Baker Perkins, Taylor Rose, Codem and Gen Phoenix. Those businesses and learners are excelling in a system that has failed too many of our young people. Today’s debate goes to the heart of my passion in this House to improve job opportunities for young people and career changers in Peterborough and around the country. I pay tribute to Peterborough college and to my new university campus, Anglia Ruskin University Peterborough, for the work they are doing in my city to transform life opportunities. In my constituency, apprenticeships are down and youth unemployment is up. Under the previous Government, the number of young people not in education, employment or training reached around 900,000, at a time of skills shortages and record net migration to the country. That includes a 40% slump in 16 to 19-year-olds taking an apprenticeship —unforgivable. This Government, I am pleased to say, recognise the severity of the situation. I pay tribute to the Minister for her sterling work to champion the cause of skills. I will talk about two challenges around the perception and reality of apprenticeships. First, following my hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth North, I want to look at how the Government must mend the broken apprenticeship levy and increase opportunities. The levy has strayed from its original purpose of providing paid, skilled opportunities mainly for young people, and ensuring that employers target their levy spend to tackle skills gaps and shortages. I thank the Minister, alongside her colleagues in the Department, for their drive to make reform of the levy a reality. All of us have a focus on certain elements of change, and I want to highlight a few areas that matter in my constituency. The first area is removing barriers related to English, maths and functional skills. We should allow flexibility on functional skills requirements, focusing on workplace-specific competencies rather than mandatory qualifications that block completion. I know from my conversations in Peterborough that that would be particularly important for construction, trades and other areas that we are talking about, where sometimes the competencies required are holding back young people who could flourish in those workspaces. The second area is increasing the availability of level 2 programmes as a crucial entry point, aligned with local skills gaps and economic needs, particularly in sectors such as construction and healthcare, and for traders and small businesses. The third is providing fast-track options for those with technical certificates or prior experience, enabling them to complete apprenticeships faster. I would also like to see the expansion of degree apprenticeships, enabling more working-class young people to acquire skills in a paid job from day one. At the end of the day, we cannot ignore the problems we face: poor skills, declining youth opportunities, stagnant wages and an over-reliance on workers from abroad. Some 11 million people of working age are currently inactive. That is a scandal, and it is the legacy of the last 14 years of Conservative Government. We all have a duty to turn it around by generating thousands more apprenticeships for young people, especially those under 25. That will be central, I believe, to the mission of this Government. That brings me to my second challenge, which is a much broader one, about how we talk about apprenticeships. The topic of this debate, the perception of trades and apprenticeships, is central to that. We need to change the language, culture and approach to careers guidance and apprenticeships. I totted up the entries in a list I got from my office, and since I was elected, as part of my work on apprenticeships, I have met more than 100 businesses and learners from my constituency and more widely. Not one learner said to me that they started their apprenticeship because of help at school. In our education system, we have a language for university but not one for apprenticeships. That cultural bias in our education system is holding young people and our country back. It needs to end. School are too often geared towards helping young people enter higher education. The language is about higher education: “What do you want to study?”, “Where are you planning to go?”, “Have you been to an open day?” We need a Government-wide and country-wide mission to change that—to make apprenticeships as important a choice as university for our young people. If we do not, we will fail. As co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on apprenticeships, I am working across the House to help find workable solutions to those issues. I am lucky enough to meet great employers and apprentices in Peterborough and around the country—particularly those in construction, which my hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth North focused on so clearly. I have met with Laing O’Rourke on building sites in east London, with Travis Perkins to look at its work to support the trade, and with young people and construction workers in my own constituency. I know the will is there. My dedication to apprenticeships is why I support the plans to get Britain working. It is why I welcome the youth guarantee, under which all young people will be offered the chance to earn and learn. It is why I will continue to campaign for an apprenticeship system that is fit for purpose—because apprenticeships are the lifeblood of decent work and growth in our economy, offering more young people a ladder of opportunity to the jobs of the future, and ensuring that our economy can sustain higher living standards through the right kind of skills training, which leads to economic growth. We are committed to changing both the scope and perception of apprenticeships. Sir Martyn Oliver’s recent Ofsted report emphasised the transformative impact that apprenticeships can have, offering young people practical skills, experience and opportunities. Those milestones underscore an important truth: apprenticeships are not a fallback, they are a springboard to success.

• 17 Dec 2024 · Great British Energy: Job Creation · Hansard source

  More

  20. What assessment he has made of the potential impact of Great British Energy on job creation in industrial communities. [R]

• 17 Dec 2024 · Great British Energy: Job Creation · Hansard source

  More

  An important aspect of Great British Energy’s work will be ensuring industrial strength in all areas of the UK. Places such as Peterborough are well placed to develop high-skilled jobs and great opportunities in green hydrogen to support that transition, through the work of National Gas in Werrington and our new university campus, Anglia Ruskin University Peterborough. Does the Minister agree that the success of GB Energy will be the breadth of opportunities that it creates in places such as mine?

• 16 Dec 2024 · Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] · Hansard source

  More

  Phew! Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. [ Laughter. ] I am privileged to speak on Second Reading of a Bill that is of huge interest to my constituents and the country. After 14 years, the new Government have inherited record levels of illegal sewage dumping in our rivers, lakes and seas, an Environment Agency budget halved since 2010, crumbling infrastructure, with bursting pipes and record spills, and unaccountable water companies. It is time to change that. It is time to hold our water companies to account and to start fixing the problem. That is why this Government have made the Water (Special Measures) Bill a priority. We need immediate action to end the disgraceful behaviour of water companies and their unruly bosses. We had more than 3,000 hours of sewage poured into our rivers in my constituency alone last year. A lot of sewage came out of the last Government, but certainly not the sewage we are talking about tonight. After our sewage discharges, Anglian Water, which I know is many Members’ provider, belatedly had to pay £38 million to Ofwat. The year before, Anglian Water’s chief executive received a £1.3 million package in pay and bonuses, despite the company’s poor performance. Despite overseeing the catastrophic failure, water chief executives have paid themselves more than £41 million in bonuses and incentives since 2010. It gets worse: Thames Water’s boss took a £195,000 bonus at the end of March for just three months’ work. That is the unacceptable face of unaccountable privatisation. Little wonder, then, that constituents writing to me are angry and that people have so little faith in the power of accountability and regulation, when so little was done by the last Government. I asked Ofwat these questions directly when it appeared before the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee recently. The answers were wanting. That is why the Bill is so needed, and why Ministers have brought it forward so quickly. It sets out new powers to make water companies accountable, to ban bonuses for CEOs and senior leaders unless high standards are met, and criminal liability for water executives, and it sets out a new approach to ensuring that water companies live up to their environmental obligations and serve the public good. I want to put on record my thanks to those public servants who have been fighting hard against the water companies, despite the cuts of the last decade: those in the Environment Agency, the public servants in our water utilities, and members of GMB, Unison and Prospect who know what looking after our water and nature is really about. The Bill treads where the last Government failed to go. Let us be clear about the Conservatives’ legacy: they failed to invest in broken infrastructure and let consumer money be spent irresponsibly on bonuses and shareholder payouts. The Bill rightly calls time on that unruly behaviour. It begins to restore trust in the management of our waterways and in public service and accountable regulation. I commend the Bill.

• 12 Dec 2024 · Business of the House · Hansard source

  More

  Peterborough lido is one of the jewels in the crown of our city. Just two years ago, we had a hydrotherapy pool and an indoor pool as well as the lido, but due to the reckless behaviour of the previous Conservative Administration, the hydrotherapy pool was bulldozed and the indoor pool was closed. The lido will be at risk in future years. Will my right hon. Friend ensure that the Government recognise the vital role of swimming for leisure, sport and wellbeing, and join me in congratulating the thousands of residents, including me, who are rallying to keep our lido safe?

• 4 Dec 2024 · Farming and Inheritance Tax · Hansard source

  More

  I thank the right hon. Member for being a champion in this House of skills and trade unions, which are sadly too rarely championed by Conservative Members. I recognise his points on our common wealth and the work that goes into looking after and protecting our land, but I also recognise the impact of the last Government on land and our farming communities. Let us look at the Conservatives’ record: 14 years of running down the DEFRA budget; a decade of austerity, which became a decade of insecurity; a Brexit turkey half-cooked; flood funding cut; trade deals that sold out British farmers; a farming budget £300 million underspent. If Conservative Members want to discuss food security and the future of our rural communities, bring it on. The Conservative party saw more than 12,000 farmers and agribusinesses forced out of business since 2010. Farming has the lowest profitability of any sector in the economy. Conservatives abolished the Agricultural Wages Board and saw rural wages stagnate, as did many Liberal Democrat colleagues, who voted in the same Lobby. Now the Conservatives are defending the status quo when it comes to big business, big landowners and rising land prices. At the start of this debate, I thought that they were literally the last people on earth defending the status quo, but some of them seem to be talking about accepting some kind of policy, while those on the Front Bench seem to be saying that there should be no change whatsoever, so the merry-go-round continues. The Opposition want all the spending but none of the responsibility. We talk about change. We know the change that this country voted for in our rural and farm communities. People voted for change because public services were broken, with rural schools crumbling, NHS waiting lists soaring, and rural GPs and NHS dentists harder to find. The Government are rightly focused on the cost of living crisis and improving access to GPs in our rural communities. What are the Opposition focused on? They are defending a tax break for estates worth up to £3 million while attacking a pay rise for the lowest paid workers in our rural communities. That says everything that we need to know about today’s Tory party.

• 4 Dec 2024 · Farming and Inheritance Tax · Hansard source

  More

  There is a lot of talk from the Opposition, who are getting very excited by this debate, about farms, but we have to remember that farms rely on farm workers. In the name of accuracy, could my hon. Friend put on the record a reminder of which Opposition parties, including the Lib Dems, voted for the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board under the last Government? That actually drove down rural wages, and we should be talking about farm workers. Is it not true to say that when the Opposition refer to exemptions, the only thing they want to talk about is exemption from their own record being under scrutiny?

• 4 Dec 2024 · Farming and Inheritance Tax · Hansard source

  More

  I certainly recognise from door-knocking in rural communities and talking to rural workers that food poverty has gone up in my constituency. People have found it harder to get a bus to go and work on a farm, and people working on farms are struggling with the result of Liz Truss’s mini-Budget, which crashed our economy. The reality of the debate that we should be having is that profitability for British farmers goes back a generation, not to 4 July. That is why the Government are pledging to put £5 billion into the farming budget and are committed to working with farmers and the sector to get that money into productive food production. It is why we will use the heft of public procurement to buy British farming produce. Food security goes to the heart of the challenges facing our country. Fixing our public services goes to the heart of rebuilding our rural communities. If the House wants to do both, it will start by rejecting the Opposition motion.

• 4 Dec 2024 · Farming and Inheritance Tax · Hansard source

  More

  Will the hon. Lady give way?

• 4 Dec 2024 · Farming and Inheritance Tax · Hansard source

  More

  That was quicker than I expected, Madam Deputy Speaker, so thank you. It is a privilege to speak in the debate. Nothing goes to the heart of the health, wellbeing and prosperity of a nation more than being able to feed and look after ourselves. Britain’s farmers and our farming workforce are part of the essential infrastructure that keeps this country going. I am proud to represent a constituency with such a rich food and farming heritage. Farming is in our DNA. I pay tribute to our farmers and farming workforce. When we talk about any other industry, we recognise the skilled workers that deliver for Britain: the steelworkers, the miners, the nurses and the doctors. We should start every debate on food and farming with the same recognition for farmers. Food security begins with the incredible work of our farmers, and I thank them. We talk about people going the extra mile to look out for each other and care for our communities; farmers do that every day. This should therefore be a welcome debate on the future of farming. It should mention farming profitability and allow the hon. Member for Mid Norfolk (George Freeman) to talk about agri-technology and how we increase profitability. I hope that he does so shortly. Instead, what do we get? It is political opportunism from a party that should know better. I am proud to be part of the largest contingent of rural Labour MPs in Britain’s history. Labour Members were elected to protect and support our rural communities, and we will do just that. After 14 years, it is a bit rich of Conservative Members now to claim that they are backing Britain’s farmers.

• 27 Nov 2024 · Respect Orders and Antisocial Behaviour · Hansard source

  More

  I think there is an unwritten rule in this House that whoever asks the last question gets to be top of the pilot list. Given its beautiful cathedral and wonderful diversity, Peterborough city centre is the jewel in Cambridgeshire’s crown, as I am sure that county colleagues present will agree, but we are being let down by the rise in antisocial behaviour. Shoplifting, street drinking, theft and intimidation are the big issues raised with me by residents, businesses and Peterborough Positive, our fantastic business improvement district. Does the Minister recognise the sheer anger that the British public feel about the fact that antisocial behaviour has not been dealt with, and about the way that they have been ghosted by the Conservative party, which, when it comes to dealing with antisocial behaviour, told them that they never had it so good? Will she explain to the House how the measures announced today will help restore trust and faith in the ability of the Government to address antisocial behaviour?

• 26 Nov 2024 · “Get Britain Working” White Paper · Hansard source

  More

  This is a momentous White Paper by a momentous Secretary of State. Yesterday, I had the great privilege to take my right hon. Friend to Peterborough college to meet excellent businesses and apprentices doing brilliant work, including EML, Baker Perkins, Taylor Rose, Codem and Gen Phoenix. Those businesses and learners are excelling in a system that has failed too many of our young people. Apprenticeships are down and youth unemployment is up in my city. Can my right hon. Friend tell us how quickly we can get going on these new trailblazers?

• 19 Nov 2024 · NHS Dentists: Access · Hansard source

  More

  7. What assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of access to NHS dentists.

• 19 Nov 2024 · NHS Dentists: Access · Hansard source

  More

  Yesterday, I heard from a disabled constituent who has spent over a year trying to find an NHS dentist, but without success. The only solution was to come to London for emergency treatment—that became a shockingly common story under the previous Government. As a first step, our integrated care board is putting 12 extra dentists into Peterborough and the surrounding towns to increase access. Will the Minister update the House on progress and on how we will further improve access to NHS dentistry?

• 18 Nov 2024 · Topical Questions · Hansard source

  More

  T7. Groups such as Light Project Peterborough do vital work to support homeless veterans, but as we know, demand has risen in recent years. Will the Minister welcome and congratulate groups such as Light Project and outline what steps he is taking to ensure support for veterans facing homelessness this winter?