Alex Barros-Curtis MP: speeches

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026

How these years work

Our reporting years run from 4 July to 3 July, starting with the 2024 general election. They are not official parliamentary sessions. Office costs keep IPSA’s April–March financial years. Records may cover only part of a year; a missing record does not mean no work was done.

Read what this MP said, asked and contributed in Parliament.

16 published records · newest first.

Speeches

  • 29 Jun 2026 · Youth Hubs · Hansard source
    More

    5. What recent progress he has made on the expansion of youth hubs.

  • 17 Jun 2026 · National Security (State Threats) Bill · Hansard source
    More

    I take the points, particularly from the Opposition, about the speed at which we are proceeding on the Bill today. However, does my hon. Friend—by the way, he is giving an excellent speech—agree that, as we have 17 more working days in this place before recess, time is of the essence? To go back to the points made earlier, we want to get this through both Houses and on to the statute book before the summer.

  • 2 Jun 2026 · Milburn Review: Interim Report · Hansard source
    More

    I am grateful to Alan Milburn for this sobering report. The proportion of young people aged 16 to 24 in south-east Wales who were NEET in the year ending June 2025 was 13.2%, and as the report indicates, that is only modelled to increase. Does my hon. Friend agree that tackling the increase in NEETs has to be a central mission of this Labour Government?

  • 21 May 2026 · Steel Strategy · Hansard source
    More

    10. What progress he has made on implementing the steel strategy.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    Before I explain why I am making that case and that decision, I will happily give way.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    I appreciate the right hon. Gentleman’s patronising tone, but I will simply say that I do not need to be told how to vote on this motion, because I do not believe that the case has been made out, as I will explain now, if I can make some progress. I underline my point by reiterating what the Speaker said earlier, and what I said to him when he was in the Chair: of course, the question we are considering is not about the application that was put before him. He has rightly made a decision, as he was required to once the application came before him, but I am clear that those who submitted that application to him were engaged in a nakedly political stunt. That is not just because of the nature of the motion before us, but because of the shapeshifting of the Opposition party leaders on this issue since The Guardian broke the story on 16 April.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    If the right hon. Gentleman will wait to hear why I think that, I will happily give way in a moment. As has been said, the motion cuts across existing procedures that everyone in this House unanimously agreed, supported and initiated just a few weeks ago. As I have stated and will go on to explain, it lacks any credibility or evidential basis.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    I rise in this debate first and foremost to reiterate, as other colleagues have done, my fullest solidarity with the victims of Epstein. We should always maintain them at the forefront of our minds. Notwithstanding their absence from the motion, I know that many colleagues on both sides of the House have referenced them, and I am sure that we will continue to do so. I want to be clear that I will vote against this motion, not because I have to be told to, but because the case has absolutely not been made. Given some of the contributions made about shaving or putting on make-up in the morning, and considering and reflecting on the vote that will be cast tonight, I will have no compunction whatsoever and absolutely no doubt in my mind when I go through the Lobby that I will have made the right decision. I do not need insinuations to the contrary impugning my integrity.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    The right hon. Gentleman is very eager. I will give way.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    The right hon. Gentleman can chunter some more, but maybe he should listen to what I say about the basis on which I reached my decision, and then I will happily give way. Before I turn to the lack of evidence to make out this case, I want to mention—as others have—the integrity of the Prime Minister. I have known him for a number of years, and I know that he is a man of integrity. I know that he will act without fear or favour, and will always be the hardest critic of himself. He has rightly apologised for the poor and incorrect decision to appoint Peter Mandelson. He has done it in this House, he has done it to the country, and most importantly, he has done it to the victims of Epstein.

  • 28 Apr 2026 · Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges · Hansard source
    More

    That is an irrelevant point. I have already said that regardless of the position of the party, I do not need to be told how I will vote on this motion, because the case has not been made out. [ Interruption. ] If people will stop chuntering, I will respond to the individuals who have said that we will have to look in the mirror tomorrow. I have no doubt that every decision we make in this place, whether on this motion, on amendments or on legislation, is made with integrity, and with the best interests of our constituents in mind, so reminding me or my colleagues of that today suggests more about the person making the statement than it does about me and the decision I have made. As I have said, I will vote against the motion, because I do not believe that the case has been made out. In my time as a solicitor, I have seen many witness statements and particulars of claim, and the case that the Leader of the Opposition laid out today was one of the most appallingly made-out cases I have seen in my professional lifetime.

  • 21 Apr 2026 · Iran: Human Rights · Hansard source
    More

    4. What recent assessment her Department has made of the human rights situation in Iran.

  • 10 Dec 2025 · Conversion Practices Ban · Hansard source
    More

    12. What steps she is taking to ban conversion practices.

  • 19 Nov 2025 · Flooding: Monmouthshire · Hansard source
    More

    I also pay tribute to all those affected and the emergency responders—and to my hon. Friend the Member for Monmouthshire (Catherine Fookes) for the tireless effort she has put in since the flooding. I am grateful to the Minister for what she has said and for what the Prime Minister said earlier about the conversations and constant interaction between the UK Government, the Welsh Government and the First Minister. Collaboration between our Governments when there are civil emergencies such as this is integral, so will she assure me that that collaboration continues and that the people of Monmouthshire will have everything they need from us? Will she also push the Welsh Government to do everything they can to ensure that those affected get through this crisis?

  • 17 Nov 2025 · Topical Questions · Hansard source
    More

    T8. What steps is the Home Secretary taking to counter the rise of extremist narratives, whether domestic or foreign-backed, that seek to undermine our democratic processes?

  • 30 Oct 2025 · Infected Blood Compensation Scheme · Hansard source
    More

    I thank my right hon. Friend for his continued compassion and commitment to the cause, and for the communications that we have had about affected constituents in my constituency. As he will recall, their concerns are about bureaucracy and delays. Given what he said in his statement, can he assure me that this Government remain committed to ensuring that all affected and infected individuals will see their compensation as quickly as possible? What assurances can he give me and my constituents about when they will be invited to start their claims?

Explore activity by topic or department

Contributions by debate topic

4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained.

View as listCommunities and local government: 5Communities and local government5Culture, media and sport: 6Culture, media and sport6Defence and foreign affairs: 12Defence and foreign affairs12Democracy and constitution: 12Democracy and constitution12Economy and business: 11Economy and business11Education and skills: 2Education and skills2Environment and energy: 3Environment and energy3Health and care: 2Health and care2Immigration and borders: 1Immigration and borders1Justice and policing: 9Justice and policing9Social security and pensions: 3Social security and pensions3Transport: 7Transport7Unclassified: 16Unclassified16
What this shows and doesn't show
4 Jul 2025–3 Jul 2026. Existing keyword taxonomy applied to official debate titles and contributions; a contribution may appear in more than one topic and unclassified records are retained. Published records do not measure effort or effectiveness. Methodology.
Department or topicPublished records
Communities and local government5
Culture, media and sport6
Defence and foreign affairs12
Democracy and constitution12
Economy and business11
Education and skills2
Environment and energy3
Health and care2
Immigration and borders1
Justice and policing9
Social security and pensions3
Transport7
Unclassified16

Published records only — not a full account of an MP’s work. How we work →